Huge glaciers between Pakistan and China GROWING – not melting
Surprise, surprise. Turns out that “only a few hundred of the roughly 200,000 glaciers worldwide have been monitored for a decade or more.”
“A team of French glaciologists has recently confirmed that glaciers in the Karakoram Range between northern Pakistan and western China “on average have remained stable or may have even grown slightly in recent years,” says this article by Rob Waugh.
The glaciologists used satellite data to study the area, which accounts for 3 percent of the total ice-covered area in the world, excluding Greenland and Antarctica.
“A sensitive ranging system allows researchers to measure the distance of the two (GRACE) satellites down to as small as 1 micron- about 1/100 the width of a human hair – and to calculate ice and water amounts from particular regions of interest around the globe using their gravity fields.”
“The researchers found that the ice had actually increased in thickness by 0.11 (plus or minus 0.22) meters per year between 1999 and 2008.”
This flies in the face of UN claims that Himalayan glaciers would melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035, leading to sea level rises and drought.
Previous estimates of ice loss in the high Asia mountains have ranged up to 50 billion tons a year, according to the University of Colorado Boulder University’s Professor John Wahr.
“The results in this region really were a surprise.”
‘One possible explanation is that previous estimates were based on measurements taken primarily from some of the lower, more accessible glaciers in Asia and were extrapolated to infer the behavior of higher glaciers,’ said Wahr.
‘But unlike the lower glaciers, many of the high glaciers would still be too cold to lose mass, even in the presence of atmospheric warming.’
Around the world, melting has been overestimated. Earth’s glaciers and ice caps are shedding roughly 150 billion tons of ice annually – up to 30 per cent lower than predicted.
Only a few hundred of the roughly 200,000 glaciers worldwide have been monitored for a decade or more.
Read that again! “Only a few hundred of the roughly 200,000 glaciers worldwide have been monitored for a decade or more.”
The doomsday scenarios used by climate extremists to destroy our freedoms are based on measurements of only a few hundred out of roughly 200,000 glaciers!
The report was published in Nature Geoscience.
Thanks to Wanda, Linda Binutti, John the 1st and Stephen Lee for this link
“This will, of course, be the leading headline in all media!” says Linda.
NOTE: I posted an article about the Karakoram Range back in February, saying that the region had lost no ice during the past ten years. The difference is that this study says the region has actually GAINED mass.
See:
http://iceagenow.info/2012/02/himalayas-lost-ice-10-years-study-shows/
8 Responses to Huge glaciers between Pakistan and China GROWING – not melting
- Powered by Google Translate.
SUNSPOTS
11 May - 4 sunspots
Credit: landscheidt.infoI receive no funding from any company, corporation, or organization. Thanks, Robert
Good news! A publisher in Italy has now translated Not by Fire but by Ice into Italian.

La Prossima Era Glaciale
Available hereCategories
- Archives
- Climategate
- Dinosaur extinction
- Dissenters
- Earthquake tracking sites
- Earthquakes
- Fighting for Food
- Fun Photos & Cartoons
- Fun/interesting videos
- Global Warming Hoax
- Growing Glaciers
- Growing glaciers in U.S.
- Ice Age Imminent
- Ice-Age Maps
- La Prossima Era Glaciale
- Little Ice Age
- Magnetic reversal
- Magnetic Reversal Chart
- Magnetic Reversals & Evolutionary Leaps
- Maunder and Dalton Minimun
- Not by Fire – The Book
- Ocean Warming
- Recommended Links
- Reviews
- Sea levels falling
- Sun Drives Climate
- Sustainability
- U.S. News & Records
- Uncategorized
- Volcanoes
- Volcanoes – Above water
- Volcanoes – Underwater
- Volcanoes – Yellowstone
- Volcanoes-Supervolcanoes
- Wolf and Sporer Minimum
- World News & Records
Are You Prepared?

I recommend this DVD






















I am sorry , but it is very likely that this news will not be relayed by the msm . On the contrary the news today on Dutch television from KNMI was record high temperatures in Greenland by a mountain station and a notification that temperatures at the Greenland coast were well over plus 20 degrees Celsius . Especially KNMI is nowdays playing an advocative role for global warming , for instance by notifying the public nearly daily of too high teperatue forecasts not in accordance with computer-forecasts of the most advanced models
Lies, lies lies
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/15/summer-peaks-on-the-greenland-ice-sheet/
“The height of summer has been reached on the Greenland ice sheet. Temperatures are a balmy -13C, and are about to start their descent towards winter.”
Thanks for the links. They just don’t know anymore what the meaning of the word “truth” is.
Notice that according to UNISYS
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom_new.gif
they’re having a “heat wave” in that region, caused by the high pressure air of the colder surface of the N. Atlantic, with the AMO about to flip to negative anomalies and the polar regions getting colder,
http://drtimball.com/2012/current-global-weather-patterns-normal-despite-government-and-media-distortions/
Imagine how it’ll be when the “heat wave” ends!
You are, or course, correct when you say these things will not make it into the MSM. These, like the drought in Afghanistan due to low glacial melt, are “inconvenient truths” that, unfortunately, do not meet the needs of those people that would prefer to see 3 to 4 billion people freeze or starve to death because we aren’t preparing for an ice age, but are “combating global warming.”
I am sure you also noticed the statement that said the icecaps were “shedding 150 billion tons of ice per year” as the article closes. Had to admit a mistake in the beginning of the article, but had to lie at the end to make up for it and reenforce the AGW common line.
And more on what is happening here
http://nextgrandminimum.wordpress.com/2012/07/14/1374/
‘One possible explanation is that previous estimates were based on measurements taken primarily from some of the lower, more accessible glaciers in Asia and were extrapolated to infer the behavior of higher glaciers,’ said Wahr.
Gee, and we are supposed to believe that they didnt know and had’nt purposely done just that? only released data on the ones that were down low affected by populations and sealevel warmth.
must have really hurt the chaps at nature to have to publish it at all.
GRACE was well able to be telling em this waaay before they announce it as news. gosh golly.
but it doesnt fit their agenda.
and yeah drought due to no ice melt..wonder how? they are going to spin that??
And they can grow very suddenly. Given the odd plastic / elastic combined behavior it’s a tricky monster. An acquaintance was recently out in that area and witnessed a near-heart-stopping sudden growth event (aka massive “avalanche” – this word does not do it justice) of a huge glacier. Anyone near the moraine would have disappeared for a really long time. Maybe thousands of years depending on if the growth continues.