You know that global warming is hitting hard, when New Mexico wakes up to -33C temperatures.
See map showing LOTS of below zero temps in New Mexico.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/03/global-warming-strikes-new-mexico-2/
Thanks to Laurel for this link
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
32 Responses to Global warming strikes New Mexico
SUNSPOTS
16 June - 2 sunspots
Credit: landscheidt.infoGood news! A publisher in Italy has now translated Not by Fire but by Ice into Italian.
La Prossima Era Glaciale
Available hereClick for full size
Ice Age Maps
Warmer than today during most of
the past 10,000 years
Temperatures warmer than today during
most of the past 10,000 years
- 557,498
Unique
VisitorsPowered By
I looked up NM on Weather Channel’s web site. Their current temperatures aren’t any where near that cold. I question that link.
Maybe I’m missing something, but 33C is not cold or really hot, imho. The link says -33C which is bloody cold and way, way below freezing….but what temperature is reality?
I think that said – 33C. The “-” was hung on the prior line. The Weather Channel web site shows lows around -20C
8-10 inches of snow is forecast for the Big Bend area of Texas(South of N.M.) by Friday.
Meanwhile as the new ice age ramps up, Chicago is forecast to exceed 50F by next Wednesday(Jan. 9). To be followed by a change in regime to more precip. and temps 2 degrees below normal(about 28F – high, 15F – low) by Jan. 13th.
In 1950 on this date Chicago had a record high of 60F.
Wild temperature swings and stronger storms are one of the harbingers of a cooling planet. Don’t put any stock in those who claim the opposite!
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Is_Weather_More_Extreme_In_A_Warmer_World.pdf
“There are no weather records of the extremes of weather for 99% of the last 10,000 years. The evidence from the Greenland ice strongly indicates that when the earth is cold the weather is crazy beyond anything we see today with inconceivably large temperature swings back and forth in very short periods of time. This indicates enormous extremes of weather.”
the 50F has since been revised downwards to low 40s…
50F now forecast for next Sat., Jan 12.
Seems they don’t really know, Wouldn’t surprise me if they downgrade it again before the end of the week. Nature is refusing to comply again and again with these warmer than normal forecasts.
Thanks for the pdf, I still think that the center of the weather oscillations is the continuous action of the solar radiations, when they are in period of change (like it’s happening now with our entrance into a new grand minimum) the oscillations should be expected because some parts of Earth’s surface are still warm from the previous period and slowly getting into equilibrium with the new average.
After some time into the new regime the equilibrium will be reached and local anomalies/oscillations, and consequent strong weather, should decrease IMO.
I guess we’ll soon discover what the new glacial period will be like.
I think the idea that the tropics remain warm during glacial periods is just another myth, we’re already seeing some regions like S. Africa and Australia showing a clear trend towards colder local climate and we’re just starting this new cooling cycle.
Meanwhile as the new ice age ramps up…Perhaps I should rephrase, as we are already in an ice-age interglacial.
Meanwhile as the next Glacial period ramps up…
The Western US is having a fairly dreadful winter. Bitter cold has settled in especially in the Great Basin and Western half of the Intermountain.
Well friends while all over the northern hemisphere cools Western UK heats up in the winter for the second time so as far see western UK will no longer get snow we to warm and the global warmests will point this out so my kids no longer know what snow is sorry for throwing the spanner in the works. The UK could see its warmest January on record tonight here in Belfast Northern Ireland its sitting at 11c at night before the rest cooled down we always got snow warmests has got 1% right Western UK if live there no longer see snow all the weather maps so continuing mild right up to february even with stratosphere heating up answer this is going to normal while the rest of the northern hemisphere freezes Western UK will always be snow and ice free so that puts the spanner in the works in the coming iceage does it can anyone here answer that
—Come on, Will! You know that the UK weather is completely bonkers — you never know what it’s going to do one day to another. I mean, look what happened earlier this year when the government was threatening drought for ever and a day, put in place a hose-pipe ban and a couple of days later it started to rain and hasn’t stopped yet…
—sorry, can’t spell: Cliffhild.
—I’ve just had a look at the weather forecast for Durango in NM and it does seem to be pretty cold down there with minus temperatures. See:
http://www.wunderground.com/weather-forecast/US/CO/Durango.html
will – usually if it’s mild there, that just means it’s extra cold somewhere else. or in other words, this doesn’t mean there’s ‘global warming’, it just means the cold your region should be getting has shifted somewhere else and that region is getting it more than normal. haven’t you been following the headlines on iceagenow? things can and do turn around. i can give you an example of here where i live, Toronto-area (Ontario, Canada) we had a mild winter last winter but i saw that Europe/Asia got hit extra hard. that explains where our cold went. And this season so far, most of december temps were about seasonal with no snow, then all of a sudden on boxing day we get hit with snow and cold, giving us just over half our monthly avg. snowfall in one storm. and the cold & snow has lingered since then. this is how things can turn around with weather. i know it’s frustrating sometimes to not have what you expect weather-wise, but just be patient. sometimes you’ll get more than you asked for.
As of 9:49PM PST 1/3/13 Las Cruses New Mexico is showing 24F and is in the middle of a snow storm.
Will don’t count your chickens yet. In 1947 the uk was experiencing quite a mild january and in mid January temperatures were around 14c. However about a week later things were different as an anti cyclone moved from france and sat over the uk drawing cold air from the artic. February 1947 turned out to be one of the coldest winters ever recorded in the uk with snow on the ground for most of february. In march 1947 there were severe gales and snow drifts of several meters in scotland. snow fell everyday somewhere in the uk from 22 january to 17th march. However the thaw set in later in march which brought devastating floods and damage as atlantic depressions brought more rain on top of the thawing snow. so we will have to wait till the end of march to see whether the uk escapes a cold winter
Impressive!
Anyone who claims to be able to predict when the next glacial advance will take place is full of bull. Based on current evidence, no one can even say for sure how sudden it will be. It could take ten or twenty years, or it could happen overnight, as in the movie The Day After Tomorrow.
The only certainty is that it will happen. ‘Not by Fire but by Ice’ details the circumstances surrounding past glaciation events all the way back to the dinosaurs and painstakingly notes the irrefutable correlation between magnetic reversals and ice ages.
Some of the things to watch out for are fluctuations in the magnetic field, volcanos, earthquakes, massive amounts of precipitation, sudden rise in sea levels followed by a drop, and, of course, cold air.
You have to wonder about some of these people who leave comments here pissing and moaning because it isn’t cold enough where they claim to be living. You have to question what’s their real agenda.
IMHO, anyone who claims he can’t wait for the planet to suffer a new deep freeze has to be a sociopath or a warmist.
Glacials, based upon ice records, take a long time to build, up to 40k years of increasingly cold mean temps. Warming takes place abruptly. The last glacial took nearly 60K years to peak and 17K to warm to the warmest period during the early Holocene.
The gotcha is that there are pretty wild swings over shorter intervals like the Little Ice Age and Younger Dryas that can span about 1000 years or less and can be nearly as profound as a full blown ice age. Abrupt warm periods can happen the same way. The present interstadial is nowhere near as warm as the last one – about 100kya.
Thanks everyone for your response the why I’m talking like this whole of Ireland never seen snow last year only slushy deposits on the hills and the only ice was frost I seen Ireland like this maybe because I’m not as old and the models still showing of a repeat of last year new areas of high keeps reforming to the south or southeast bringing colder conditions to eastern Britain but kept Western Britain mild and wet I do believe the world is continuing to get colder I’m only saying this because the warmests will use here as a example . I have to my kids to the Europe to show them the snow.I’m 100% behind the coming of the next iceage we are already over due one that’s the fact and nothing anyone can argue against it but I’m hoping to see the snow for the my kids sake to keep these lying warmests mouths shut thanks
Will, 2010 saw really heavy snow in both Britain, Scotland and Ireland. Sattelite images show both islands looking like Greenland. Where were you then?
Meanwhile in El Paso, Texas they maybe receiving A YEARS worth of snow in just a few days. http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-03/el-paso-may-receive-almost-a-year-s-worth-of-snow-overnight.html
I live in Deming, New Mexico and I was VERY annoyed by this article – a few days of cold weather does not an ice age make. Especially since we’ve had MONTHS of record high heat and years of severe drought in NM – especially southern NM. Today’s KOB page had this article, which is more to the point: http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S2885963.shtml?cat=500
Ruth, though I do agree with you that ‘a few days of cold weather does not an ice-age make’, “more dry years than wet years” is completely consistent with ice-age climate.
Increased aridity is one of the hallmarks of ice-ages.
“Another factor is the increased aridity occurring with glacial maxima, …”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age#Negative_feedback_processes
Though we are not anywhere near Glacial max., aridity or drought conditions are normal for the S.W. U.S.: NV, UT, NM, AZ, So.Cal, W.Tex.
Looking at the global picture tells a different story than that of NM’s.
Record ice in Antarctic, record freeze of Hudson Bay this year, record cold and snow in China, 2.4 deg. avg. temp. reduction in AK in the last decade, etc.
33degrees celsius? Was that in some ones green house? I had a look at the map mentioned above and everything looked like it was near or below zero.
The warmists are still flogging a dead horse.
Look again it says negative 33 Celsius
Steve, did you notice the minus sign?
…wakes up to -33C…
It seems I missed seeing the minus sign and assumed some one was trying to state that it was plus 33 degrees celsius.
you should notice the countries like that Russia china and japan can protect themselves from HAARP heating waves come from USA living cold conditions.another countries can not protect themselves from HAARP are warm now.Because illimunati want peoples believe global warming to collect extra taxes
Humbug. If HAARP can make things hot or cold, maybe the cold war is full on and that’s why Russia is in deep freeze. (sarcasm)
I can tell you it was -26 in Alamosa Colorado on Thursday night which isn’t far from New Mexico. Im sure it wasn’t too far off..
Alamosa, CO, sits in a cold hole and is usually colder than any part of NM.