NY Times Environmental Desk Goes the Way of Global Warming
“The Times lied about global warming—now called “climate change”—on a daily basis.”
NY Times Environmental Desk Goes the Way of Global Warming
By Alan Caruba
“What’s in worse shape””, asked the Heartland Institute’s Director of Communications, Jim Lakely, in a January 11th blog post. “The state of the Earth’s climate? Or the state of the New York Times? Global temperatures are not rising all that quickly, so the Earth is doing fine. Meanwhile, the Old Gray Lady is shutting down its Environmental Desk.”
The Heartland Institute has cause to celebrate because it has led the effort to debunk the global warming hoax, sponsoring international conferences that brought together the world’s leading scientists and others to demonstrate how specious the alleged “science” of global warming was and is. It did so in the face of a United Nations agenda to advance the hoax and a compliant and cooperative media that did nothing to dispute it.
In the interest of full disclosure, I have been an unpaid policy advisor to The Heartland Institute for many years, only once receiving a small grant many years ago to help fund research involving the global warming hoax. These days donations to my blog help sustain the effort.
As the planet enters its seventeenth year in which temperatures have been steadily falling in response to a natural cooling cycle, the result of reduced solar radiation, the global warming hoax is finally being revealed as an instrument of the United Nations and individual governments, including our own, to impose “carbon taxes” that would raise billions of dollars for everyone involved.
The New York Times with its vaunted reputation has been suffering the same fate as many daily newspapers in the U.S., as well as news magazines such as Newsweek and Time. The rise of the Internet has bled off advertising revenue, but I maintain that as alternative sources of information became available, the Times and the mainstream media has suffered a loss of credibility across the spectrum of news topics.
In the case of the Times, however, their journalistic sins were much worse than others because it led the global warming hoax from its beginning, never failing to fill its pages about rising sea levels (they’re not rising precipitously), declining polar bear populations (they’ve increased), and using every weather event from hurricanes to tornadoes to droughts (all cyclical and natural) to shout about a “global warming” caused by carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas emissions” that had nothing whatever to do with a non-existent threat to the nation and the planet.
Bluntly stated, the Times lied about global warming—now called “climate change”—on a daily basis.
The Times Environmental Desk had a team of editors and reporters that never lost an opportunity to further the greatest hoax of the modern era and one can only hope that reporters like Andrew Revkin will be reassigned to cover high school football and soccer games in the tri-state area. On his Facebook page, Revkin said he was never a fan of the desk even though he worked for it and lamented the elimination of an environmental editor. It is doubtful, however, that the Times will eliminate its editors and teams that cover the White House, Congress, and other activities of interest to readers, including sports.
Maybe it was just serendipitous—the Times has been cutting back on staff for quite some time now—but I believe the news that the poster boy of global warming, Al Gore, had sold his television channel, Current, to al Jazeera, a notably anti-American channel that gained fame broadcasting Osama bin Laden’s rants, was the “final straw” that led to the decision to shut down its Environmental Desk.
In a January 11th Wall Street Journal commentary, Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., wrote that “Mr. Gore and his allies wore out their welcome with their exaggerations, their self-righteousness, and their perfectly foolish insistence that a plurality of voters could be morally bullied into giving up their self-interest if chastised long and loudly enough by Mr. Gore.” His commentary took to task the lies of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that extrapolated from 1.58% of the Earth surface—the lower 48 U.S. states—to suggest a global warming phenomenon.
The public did not rush to purchase electric cars, nor did they install expensive solar panels on the roofs of their homes. Instead they worried about the price of gasoline and the rising cost of electricity and other expenses whose costs have been increased by extraordinary bad “environmental” laws and regulations such as the requirement that ethanol be added to each gallon, increasing is cost while decreasing mileage, and destroying the engines under the hoods of millions of automobiles. As forty percent of the nation’s corn crop was siphoned off to make ethanol the cost of most food items at the supermarket increased as well.
The good news is that there will not be an environmental editor or deputy environmental editor at the Times, nor seven reporters whose sole job was to report lies intended to advance and bolster the agenda of the Environmental Protection Agency, NOAA, and the agendas of heavily funded environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and the World Wildlife Federation.
The “newspaper of record” has debased itself and the profession of journalism for too long as a leading participant in the progressive movement’s effort to impose socialism on the greatest example of the power of capitalism and the free market—the United States—the world has ever known.
© Alan Caruba, 2013
http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2013/01/ny-times-environmental-desk-goes-way-of.html
Alan Caruba’s commentaries are posted daily at “Warning Signs” and shared on dozens of news and opinion websites. His blog recently passed more than two million page views. If you love to read, visit his monthly report on new books at Bookviews. For information on his professional skills, Caruba Editorial Services is the place.
15 Responses to NY Times Environmental Desk Goes the Way of Global Warming
- Powered by Google Translate.
SUNSPOTS
24 May - 3 sunspots
Credit: landscheidt.infoI receive no funding from any company, corporation, or organization. Thanks, Robert
Good news! A publisher in Italy has now translated Not by Fire but by Ice into Italian.

La Prossima Era Glaciale
Available hereCategories
- Archives
- Climategate
- Dinosaur extinction
- Dissenters
- Earthquake tracking sites
- Earthquakes
- Fighting for Food
- Fun Photos & Cartoons
- Fun/interesting videos
- Global Warming Hoax
- Growing Glaciers
- Growing glaciers in U.S.
- Ice Age Imminent
- Ice-Age Maps
- La Prossima Era Glaciale
- Little Ice Age
- Magnetic reversal
- Magnetic Reversal Chart
- Magnetic Reversals & Evolutionary Leaps
- Maunder and Dalton Minimun
- Not by Fire – The Book
- Ocean Warming
- Recommended Links
- Reviews
- Sea levels falling
- Sun Drives Climate
- Sustainability
- U.S. News & Records
- Uncategorized
- Volcanoes
- Volcanoes – Above water
- Volcanoes – Underwater
- Volcanoes – Yellowstone
- Volcanoes-Supervolcanoes
- Wolf and Sporer Minimum
- World News & Records
























well there not giving up the fraud in Australia http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2013/01/abc-bias-yet-again-and-sea-level-alarmism/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=abc-bias-yet-again-and-sea-level-alarmism what a joke
Give them time and its at the risk of really extreme embarrassment they will drop it as the Met already has and now this as we see, just give it time.
gotta get th taxes! I see sth aus has a drive to remove all bachfront shacks yet again ( so the rich can build) under the idiocy of sea level rises.
uh uh more like coastal erosion caused by seagrass dieoff due to sewage outfalls killing it.’
been a known fact by csiro and DSE for decades but they wont admit it publicly, the reports ARE online if you hunt for them.
It hasn’t spread to the Guardian and the Independent in the UK just yet.
Shame……
HOORAY!!!
what truly excellent news this is!
now if the gaurdians greenlight or whatever would only stfu as well, and stop pushing the same lies and agenda 21 human hate, the workd might manage to get back into something like reality and functionality again.
meanwhile our aussie pm has her head up her??/ or in the sand as usual. and the extrememly biased national broadcaster abc is still pushing the agw barrow.
the day their science editor gets the boot I WILL hold a party!
Tell ‘em to write a story about HAARP in the US and Russia.
Ask ‘em to find out whether America can cause mass misery through climate warfare.
Ask ‘em whether they can ‘tune’ the ionosphere to mimic a CME coming from the sun.
Ask ‘em whether they would ever consider inducing tsunamis.
Ask ‘em whether they can use electromagnetic radiation to induce earthquakes or volcanoes yet.
Ask ‘em where they draw the line on ‘acceptable collateral damage’ where all that is concerned.
They could use it for good to mitigate the effects of natural climate.
Or they could use it for genocides.
Oh, it might be quite subtle. A tsunami here, a cold snap there. 100,000 debt just to warn governments not to misbehave. They wouldn’t dare 100 million deaths. Too obvious. But ‘salami slicing’ using weather warfare??
They might try that…..
And they’d do it all under the cover of the misdirection using carbon dioxide……..
It would be the scoop of the century, if it were true.
Is it??
Who’s prepared to risk their life to find out??
No it isn’t.
Spoilsport.
Let them use all the corn to make ethanol. Something like 88% of all corn is GMO. It has the Bt toxin in it. There is evidence that the Bt toxin reproduces in our, human, guts from either eating the corn or eating the meat of animals fed the corn. The Bt toxin can create leaky gut syndrome and all the health problems that entails. The FDA allows Monsanto to do their own testing. And Monsanto says GMO’s are just fine. Right! Just like Al Gore, et al, told us that the non-existent global warming was human caused.
Since when does the FDA have someone ELSE do the testing? Isn’t it THEIR job to protect us and not some rich company that will skewer results for their own benefit?
What are we paying them for then?
Crack a bottle of champagne let out some of that CO2 and give a cheer. The war is not won, but you gotta take your victories where you find them.
Good riddance to bad rubbish but don’t expect the pols to give up their carbon tax schemes that easily.
Right on Mr. Alan Caruba!!!
There is a Major high pressure ridge off the West Coat and a MONSTER storm off of Japan that dropped 20MB in 12 hours.
That particular storm is down to 935milibars now and I wonder how much the current weather pattern will be altered and to what extent??
Is the Pacific Ocean warming at all? Underwater volcanos perhaps?
Right now the PNA is + right now which is no good for cold or snow.
The NYT had an “Environment desk?” I thought it was just a fax machine strait from Mann and Hansen.