Which is going to die first – corona virus fever or climate change?

“Now, supposed connections of the CV-19 virus with “climate change” are also being proposed. If there is any credence to that at all, it can only be that the massive misappropriations of some western countries in order to “save the climate” are the cause rather than a solution to deaths from viral diseases.”
– Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
_____________

Which is going to die first – corona virus fever or climate change?

Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser

The news is dire and, in some ways getting worse. There are more reported “cases” of corona virus infections every day and, as of late, more “climate change” alarmism, sometimes in the same breath.

Government entities around the world have prescribed draconian measures to curtail individual freedoms of all kinds, like assembly and movement, like voicing opinions and more.  All of that solely in the name of fighting the COVID-19 (CV-19) virus.

Universities are closed, many for the entire term. Most schools are closed as well. Not to mention concert halls, theaters, and other public events where the 2m (or 6 ft.) “social” or “physical” distance requirement cannot be met.

These rules are ruining the livelihood of many people and the advancement in knowledge and understanding of the younger generation. This will have long-term detrimental repercussions not just for themselves but for the entire society.

In the agricultural sector, many farms that have relied on the help of experienced seasonal workers to prune fruit trees and plant seedlings are not allowed or are unable to travel to their former destinations. Even local helpers, that used to travel in a crew-cab pickup truck for a few miles cannot do so without breaking the law.

In addition, recent severe frosts over much of eastern Europe have decimated or annihilated this year’s expected harvest of tree fruits.

And, even at the nation state level, “to hell” with your best friend’s purchase order – even if paid in advance. The new marching orders are claimed to be:

We are in this all together — Really?

To any independent observer, it looks more like “everyone for him-/herself, or as best as one can!

Good riddance to the thought of a “global family” of well-minded folks. When push comes to shove, as currently in vogue, there’s “no holds barred.”

One of the first victims of the new view is, widely observable in my mind, any truthful reporting by the main-stream media (MSM) on whatever. This problem starts already with the terminology used for certain events, for example the term “case(s).”

The “Cases”

In common parlance, this term “cases” has meanings that range from “barely perceptible” to “near death.” If that term were not yet confusing enough, now comes another wrinkle, i.e. “corona virus deaths.”  The term “cases” is frequently mentioned by the media, together with the latest “death toll,” tabulated by such institutions as (U.S.)  Johns-Hopkins University and the (German) Robert Koch Institute.

What’s missing is a clear definition of the terms “cases and “active cases.” In some MSM reports they appear refer to people found to be infected, in others to all persons tested, in yet others to those with CV-symptoms.

Of course, “cases” of infection with the virus is not the same as “deaths.” In fact, only a fraction of the “confirmed cases of infection” are fatal. This fraction is in most countries less than 3%. Yes, that’s still a high percentage but it also needs to be “normalized” to the remaining “life expectancy” of the people affected – and all other (potentially true) causes of death.

News from Iceland

New data, for example from Iceland show that the “corona-pandemic” is rapidly being viewed by specialists and non-specialists alike as just another “flu.” In contrast to most other surveys, Iceland tested, on a random basis, approximately 3.5% of its entire population and found that only half of those who tested positive showed any symptoms. If that ratio is similar in other countries, it would also mean that the actual death rates from the CV virus are only half of those arrived at from “confirmed cases.”

The deaths mentioned in the MSM rarely mention any other health-impairments. What’s more important though is putting those numbers into perspective, or into relationship to deaths from all causes.

Deaths from all Causes

With the death rates in many western societies being around 1(+/- 0.2)% of the entire populations per annum, one can easily do the math. For example, in the U.S., (all numbers rounded) with roughly 340 million residents, that’s 3.4 million per annum, or in the order 300,000 per month. In Canada, with its population roughly 1/10 of the U.S., it is 30.000 deaths per month from all causes.

In fact, most of the “CV-19” deaths in Italy have now been ascribed to pneumonia as the main cause.

In Europe, with a total population of ~500 million, the number of deaths from all causes calculates to over 400,000 per month.

Deaths from COVID-19

Now, compare that to rates of death from the COVID-19 virus (and or other corona-type virus’ effects): So far, in Canada, there are 503 deaths attributed to that. That compares with 50,000+ deaths from all causes over a period of two months alone.

When one looks at those numbers on a whole population basis, they barely differ between the larger entities, even for Europe, including COVID-19 ravaged areas in northern Italy, Spain, and France, the number of deaths, ascribed to the virus, now account to roughly 2% of the entire population.

However, even this number does not mean that every death reported as such was actually due to the COVID-19 virus, far from it.

Deaths from – as opposed to — with infection

Deaths from, in contrast those with, infections are not the same. In fact, a large number of people whose death is ascribed to the CV-19 bug have already had another health issue, many even more than one. In many situations, that makes it difficult to ascertain the true or even the preponderance of causes. However, it appears to be common practice to ascribe any death to the most recent observation.

In “normal” times, any mis-associations would probably balance out to near the actual and true causes. Not so right now. There appears to be a “real benefit” to such “from CV-19” death allocations.

In this context, it may also be of interest to read the recent post by M. Vadum at PSI, entitled The CDC Confesses To Lying About COVID-19 Death Numbers.

The CV-19 “Benefit”

A recent report cites highly concerning (financial) incentives to provide unsubstantiated claims. As reported by Jim Hoft on PSI (https://principia-scientific.org/hospitals-paid-extra-to-list-patients-as-covid19-3x-as-much-if-the-patient-on-ventilator/ ), “Dr. Jensen also disclosed that hospitals are paid more if they list patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis. And hospitals get paid THREE TIMES AS MUCH if the patient then goes on a ventilator.”

If that isn’t an incentive to hyper(?)-ventilate, I don’t know what is. Clearly, factual reporting of the actual cause is more than likely amiss.

And now, supposed connections of the CV-19 virus with “climate change” are also being proposed. If there is any credence to that at all, it can only be that the massive misappropriations of some western countries in order to “save the climate” are the cause rather than a solution to deaths from viral diseases.

The (sad) Upshot

Between the massive waste of funds for “climate change” and “decarbonisation” plans of many western societies, all based on the faulty belief of carbon dioxide being a driver of the “climate,” those funds would have better gone to beneficial social support rather than to economy destroying programs.

The people who suffer most from such COVID-inspired rules are not the elderly (who, admittedly, suffer the most deaths) but the young generations that are already severely short-shrifted in terms of their ability to raise families in the hope for a better life in future.

That observation leaves me with one crucial question:

Cui bono — who benefits from this “globalist” scheme?

__________________________

Dr Klaus L E KaiserDr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser is a professional scientist with a Ph.D. in chemistry from the Technical University, Munich, Germany. He has worked as a research scientist and project chief at Environment Canada‘s Canada Centre for Inland Waters for over 30 years and is currently Director of Research at TerraBase Inc. He is author of nearly 300 publications in scientific journals, government and agency reports, books, computer programs, trade magazines, and newspaper articles.

Dr. Kaiser has been president of the International Association for Great Lakes Research, a peer reviewer of numerous scientific papers for several journals, Editor-in-Chief of the Water Quality Research Journal of Canada for nearly a decade, and an adjunct professor. He has contributed to a variety of scientific projects and reports and has made many presentations at national and international conferences.

Dr. Kaiser is author of CONVENIENT MYTHS, the green revolution – perceptions, politics, and facts
convenientmyths.com

Dr. Kaiser can be reached at: mail@convenientmyths.com


9 thoughts on “Which is going to die first – corona virus fever or climate change?”

  1. Dr. Kaiser, It appears the death numbers are going to shortly become even less accurate:

    FUDGING THE DEATH NUMBERS
    In case you are keeping alive in your mind that the exaggerated number of Covid-19 deaths might be just an “error,” look at this:

    IN THE US, a briefing note from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Service read as follows
    “It is important to emphasize that . . . Covid-19 should be reported for all decedents where the disease caused or is presumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

    Updated April 3 to: “In cases where a definite diagnosis of Covid-19 cannot be made, but is suspected or likely. . . it is acceptable to report Covid-19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a covid-19 infection was likely.” [This means in the absence of a test-positive]

    IN BRITAIN National Health Service guidance for filling out death certificates:
    “If before death patient had symptoms typical of covid19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘covid19’ as the cause of death, and then share the test result when it becomes available. In the circumstances of their being no swab, it is satisfactory to apply clinical judgement.”

    Further, according to a NEW UK law the body need not be seen by a coroner. Any medical doctor can sign the cause of death, EVEN IF THEY HAVE NEVER SEEN THE BODY LIVING OR DEAD & THERE IS NO TEST. What can “clinical judgement” mean in this circumstance?
    https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/05/covid19-death-figures-a-substantial-over-estimate/

    IN MINNESOTA a State Congressman-Doctor received instructions on filling out the death certificate. Video interview: https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/10/watch-dr-scott-jensen-reveals-ridiculous-covid19-guidance/

  2. In California “case” means only that a person is “test-positive”. We are never told how many tests were done to find the “test-positives.” There is always great dismay about additional test-positives, but this is meaningless without knowing the number of tests done: If 100 are positive among 1000 tests, that’s 10% incidence. And if 500 are positive among 5000 tests, that’s not an “Oh NO!!” It’s just increased testing.

    Censorship in Denmark has been prohibited since 1849 by the Constitution:
    § 77: Any person shall be at liberty to publish his ideas in print, in writing, and in speech, subject to his being held responsible in a court of law. Censorship and other preventive measures shall never again be introduced.

    “Apr 7
    On April 2nd, #Denmark passed a law making it ILLEGAL to publish contradictions to, or criticisms of, government #Covid19 policy.”

    Sorry, this Denmark law was mentioned on off-guardian.org, but I could only find the Twitter, which is what I quoted above. Just thought it would be interesting/tragic to pull up their constitution re censorship.

    Dear lord, prohibition against censorship isn’t just for when you’re comfortable with speech. It’s a recognition that information and thought and rationality and consent are necessary guides to action.

  3. Who benefits, Dr. Kaiser? Why I suppose at least 3 categories of people:

    –“exercise was organized by the Davos World Economic Forum in cooperation with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    The exercise was held in New York City on 18 October 2019, for the specific purpose of mapping the response of transnational corporations and governments to a coronavirus epidemic.
    15 world leaders took part in this exercise, including the two Chinese and American officials in charge of fighting epidemics.” https://www.voltairenet.org/article209126.html
    F. William Engdahl has an article in which he notes the perfect ability of Bill Gates to predict the future. https://www.globalresearch.ca/coronavirus-gates-foundation/5706842

    –Those mega-corps that will receive direct handouts. I haven’t researched it yet, but here’s a link describing some of it. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55027.htm
    Wall St Wins Again – Nomi Prinz

    –It’s an immense power-grab by the privately-owned Fed and the very largest transnational corps whose controllers are at the heart of the NWO. The Swiss Corporation Study confirms the terrible concentration of wealth & power.

    The current bail-out will most likely be immune from FOIA requests, so we won’t even know who got the money; it’s at least half a trillion. Here’s a tiny quote:
    “This is a bailout, then, of a highly irresponsible bonanza of corporate lending. All of this debt was run up well before any coronavirus crisis; what is the rationale that the Fed has to backstop this market? Plus, the Fed already has the $4.5 trillion bazooka, why do they also need a program to buy up increasingly worthless corporate debt?

    “Incredibly, the Fed put BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, in charge of this and two other bond-buying programs. One of the programs involves buying up exchange-traded funds, and nobody has issued more of those than BlackRock. The firm can theoretically direct itself to buy up its own troubled funds and take fees on it! Whatever the purchases, BlackRock unquestionably stands to make hundreds of billions of dollars.”
    https://prospect.org/coronavirus/unsanitized-federal-reserve-loads-cannon/

    [BlackRock and Vanguard together, who own each other, seem also to own just about the whole US health system & are the reason why we have the most expensive medical care while we are 33d in life expectancy.] http://thesaker.is/the-oligarch-takeover-of-us-pharma-and-healthcare-and-the-resulting-human-crisis/ Jon Hellevig

    If we only knew who BlackRock really is, I expect we could really answer your question of “Who benefits?”

  4. I did similar calculations in a comment to a previous post, arriving at 100 million global deaths/annum. For 100 causes of death the average is 1 million/annum/cause.

  5. Corona virus, climate change- AGW, 911, 311, WW 1&2 ,the status of Jews in the eyes of god and man and a host of other events throughout history is generally misunderstood by the masses due to half truths and out right politically correct lies. People are brainwashed and filled with fear of the truth or of even taking a look at the other side of the story for fear of being called names or winding up like general Patton or JFK. Like it was said in the movie Dune,” Fear is the mind killer”.

  6. well I see the benefit
    no ext reb protests;-)
    and an entire planet just copped a hefty taste of what a green new deal /agenda 21/30 lifestyle would be more like
    somehow I dont think the ultragreen younguns are enjoying no travel concerts and all the fossilfuelled pleasures of life, as well as short supply or none of their new notvery green gadgets like iphones etc
    I sure am enjoying no planes overheadmyself. but the young and not so young traveller types are moaning loudly.
    i also know Im an outlier in regard to what the predominant society expects or wants/demands as vital to their happiness.
    I dont believe travel is necessary in most instances, for holiday OS travel definitely not necessary at all.and certainly not a regular event demanded by the stil at school kids ie Bali holidays etc. instead of at home on any one of thousands of perfectly good coastal resorts or towns we have in Aus.
    I buy secondhand or repair gadgets and devices and consider the 1k+ cost of a phone utterly obscene.
    growing up before opshops even existed meant hand me down cutdown clothes etc as many of my age also found normal then. opshops are a luxury source;-)
    keeping at least one month food and other basics on hand at all times is also old fashioned but by hell its serving me well right now, and it cost me far less to slowly accumulate and accrue all that and seeds etc than its costing everyone now as prices soared due to idiots panicking. theres not much that breaks or fails i havent got a spare for or something i can rejig to make a spare from. local tip andgarage sales are damned useful resources too.
    Im hoping many more are learning a lesson in resourcefullness and self reliance from this and go on and keep doing it.

  7. Apparently no-one dies anymore unless they have coronavirus.

    In Australia automobiles are far more dangerous and the risk from them pales into insignificance to the 2.5 million who still smoke at highly dangerous levels, the millions who consume too much fat, and the millions that drink wayyy too much alcohol !

    This is not about a virus – governments were primed to deprive us of our freedoms from the get go.

    How about this ?

    I can’t take my partner to a beach or park because of social distancing rules but the local aerodrome is allowed to conduct flight training in light aircraft every day – just hoe do you practice social distancing in a light aircraft ?

    How about this piece of totalitarianism from the UK ?

    Police break into some guy’s home – smash the door down – because his neighbours reported he may be having an illegal gathering !!

    He was watching TV with the volume a bit loud.

    No matter these arseholes smash their way into his home for no reason other than they enjoy the rush of pushing people around !

    https://twitter.com/BanTheBBC/status/1249598512427347969

    4 useless arseholes !

    How about this ?

    Coronavirus: Cambridge Police checks no one is in non-essential aisles at supermarket ???

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-cambridge-police-checks-no-one-is-in-non-essential-aisles-at-supermarket-11971517

    By God I hope you yanks are smart enough to re-elect Trump – he seems to be the only leader resisting this totalitarian push.

    The rest of the arseholes will sell us out at the drop of a hat !

  8. According to Dr. John Campbell, covid deaths in the UK are being underreported because only deaths in hospital are being counted, NOT deaths at home or in nursing homes!

    IS THIS BEING REPORTED BY THE MEDIA IN THE UK!?!!!!!

    (Sorry, Lyn, the Devil made me do it!)

  9. Good read.
    What’s happening is; it’s an opportunity to swindle $$$$ from legit sources without any accountability to tax payers. These types of criminal activity need to be put down ASAP.

Comments are closed.